Cases 161 - 170 of 6,734
DUYZINGS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv21574
Petitioner:
ROBERT VAN BOMMEL DUYZINGS
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIVERA-VILLA v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv21573
Petitioner:
JULIAN RIVERA-VILLA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JIMINEZ-BIOJO v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv21325
Petitioner:
PAULINO JIMINEZ-BIOJO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DENISIUK v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2023cv21522
Petitioner:
JOSHUA DENISIUK
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CORTES-MARTINEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv20586
Petitioner:
JAVIER CORTES-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MATA-SOTO v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv08208
Petitioner:
JOSE MATA-SOTO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KOWALEWSKI v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv20320
Petitioner:
STANLEY J. KOWALEWSKI
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DE LIMA v. ACTING WARDEN OF FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv21256
Petitioner:
PEDRO VICIOSO DE LIMA
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN OF FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DIAZ-NIVAR v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv06158
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL DIAZ-NIVAR
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOSLEM v. WARDEN, F.C.I. FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv06112
Petitioner:
SAAED MOSLEM
Respondent:
WARDEN, F.C.I. FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
