Cases 171 - 180 of 11,555
Allen v. McFarlane
as 1:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Miles Johnathan Allen
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferson v. State
as 1:2024cv00599
Petitioner:
Orlando Jefferson
Respondent:
State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hudson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv05734
Petitioner:
Brittany Hudson
Respondent:
United States of America and Patrick J. Lechleitner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JEFFERSON v. STATE
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
ORLANDO LAMAR JEFFERSON
Respondent:
STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HACKETT v. SMITH
as 7:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
BRIAN HACKETT
Respondent:
WARDEN TAMARSHE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Almeida-Barreto v. Warden, F.C.I. Jesup
as 2:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Marco Ian Almeida-Barreto
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frazier v. Odum
as 4:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
James A. Frazier
Respondent:
Warden Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burk v. Superior Court Catoosa Co
as 4:2023cv00294
Petitioner:
Arnold Cordell Burk
Respondent:
Superior Court Catoosa Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley v. Smith
as 4:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Marcus Smiley
Respondent:
Tarmarshe Smith
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
