Cases 171 - 180 of 4,263
Shields v. McKenzie
as 1:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Shields, Sr.
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. United States
as 6:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Gregory Eugene Davis
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dillon v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Eric Dillion and Eric Dillon
Defendant:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mart v. Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
Bobby Mart, Jr.
Respondent:
Kentucky Department of Corrections and Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. United States Probation Office et al
as 5:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
James R Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Probation Office and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ellis v. Paul
as 5:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Romney C. Ellis
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kamau v. Tindal
as 3:2023cv00252
Petitioner:
Khalfani Kamau
Respondent:
Jeff Tindal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Paul
as 5:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Smith
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Snell v. Green
as 2:2023cv00047
Petitioner:
Curtis Snell
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Parker
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
