Cases 171 - 180 of 8,836
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Luneke
as 1:2023cv01375
Petitioner:
Eugene Wade
Respondent:
Warden Doug Luneke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv02595
Petitioner:
Kendall K. Richards
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singleton v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institute
as 1:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Richard Singleton
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chilcoat v. Government
as 3:2023cv01729
Petitioner:
Donald E. Chilcoat
Defendant:
Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fields v. Robinson
as 1:2023cv01340
Petitioner:
David Fields
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Picard v. Gray
as 1:2023cv01416
Petitioner:
John S. Picard
Respondent:
Warden David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Preston v. Summit County Common Pleas Court et al
as 5:2023cv01645
Petitioner:
Angela Elaine Preston
Respondent:
Summit County Common Pleas Court and Portage County Common Pleas Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calton v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01613
Petitioner:
Ronnie Calton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shank v. Gray
as 1:2023cv01547
Petitioner:
Patrick J. Shank
Respondent:
Warden David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
