General Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 1:2019cv00847
Respondent: Georgia Board of Pardons, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, WARDEN JERMANE WHITE and others
Petitioner: David Timothy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 5:2019cv00025
Respondent: CHAIRMAN JAMES W MILLS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Petitioner: DAVID TIMOTHY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BATTLE v. DOE
as 5:2018cv00243
Respondent: UNNAMED DEFENDANT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Petitioner: TERRY LEE BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. U S GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Petitioner: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent: U S GOVERNMENT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GWINGUE v. DOES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00015
Petitioner: CHEIKH GWINGUE
Defendant: JOHN/JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. BRIGHT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00080
Plaintiff: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant: FRED BRIGHT, BILL MASSEY, KIMBERLY EASTERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv03658
Petitioner: Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent: Brian Owens, John Doe, Jr., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FAIRCLOTH v. STEPHENS et al
as 6:2013cv00045
Petitioner: Don Robert Faircloth
Respondent: J. Tyson Stephens and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FAIRCLOTH v. STEPHENS et al
as 5:2013cv00143
Petitioner: DON ROBERT FAIRCLOTH
Respondent: J TYSON STEPHENS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MERRITT v. WYNN et al
as 1:2012cv00030
Petitioner: TYLER DERON MERRITT
Respondent: JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and CHRIS WYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?