Cases 11 - 20 of 138
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv03063
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv02855
Petitioner:
Landon A Whitfield
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv02687
Petitioner:
Landon A Whitfield
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv02482
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Speakes v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01413
Petitioner:
Joshua S Speakes
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pemberton v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv01370
Petitioner:
Devin A. Pemberton
Respondent:
USA, USP Marion and Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pancratz v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2023cv01773
Petitioner:
James Pancratz
Respondent:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board, Edith Cripler, Leann Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avant v. Jefferies et al
as 1:2023cv01100
Petitioner:
Cordell Avant
Respondent:
Rob Jefferies, Danielle Coryle and Craig Findley
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gallant v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00005
Petitioner:
Daniel James Gallant
Respondent:
Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
