Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Jones v. Williams et al
as 3:2019cv00256
Defendant:
Nick McLendon, Jered K. Tomlinson and Vicky Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Archie Cleveland Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. The United States of America
as 3:2018cv00571
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2018cv00564
Defendant:
Prosecutor Mary Cotton, Judge Benny K. Warrington, Sheriff Investigator Terry Gann and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Buckley v. Banks et al
as 3:2018cv00426
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
M.D.O.C. Records Dept., Supt. J. Banks and Assistant Warden K. Blount
Plaintiff:
Michael Buckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steele v. Sollie
as 3:2016cv00702
Petitioner:
Marcus K. Steele, II
Respondent:
Billie Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Jones et al
as 5:2016cv00032
Petitioner:
Jerome K. Harris
Respondent:
Justin Jones, Paulesha McBride, Jim C. Blough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clay v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2015cv00623
Plaintiff:
David K. Clay
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
as 3:2015cv00582
Petitioner:
Willis K. Jones
Respondent:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00157
Petitioner:
Sandra K. Ellis
Respondent:
Mississippi Department of Corrections , De Soto County, Miss. and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
