General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 53
GAD v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv05933
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA.
Petitioner: AHMED F. GAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASTELLANOS v. DELBALSO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv03578
Petitioner: EVAN CASTELLANOS
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THERESA DELBALSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOSSONS v. MCGINLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv03563
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY
Petitioner: NICHOLAS JAMES BOSSONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PELLOT v. MARSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv03223
Petitioner: ELIAS PELLOT, JR
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, ROBERT MARSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. GARMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv03125
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner: MIKOS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAMIREZ v. SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS et al
as 5:2019cv01295
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, COM OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner: GENESIS MATOS RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCHEFFLER v. HARRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00610
Petitioner: JOHN SCHEFFLER
Respondent: LAUREL HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHRISTINE v. CLARK et al
as 5:2018cv00237
Petitioner: JACOB CHRISTINE
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CERAUL v. GILMORE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv03486
Petitioner: THOMAS CERAUL
Respondent: ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. MAHALLY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv01648
Petitioner: ALI ELIJAH DAVIS
Respondent: LAWRENCE MAHALLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?