General Cases filed in Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Piasecki v. Currie Do Not Docket. Case transferred to the Houston Division. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00162
Petitioner: Terry Lee Piasecki
Respondent: Gary L Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Stephens
as 5:2015cv00005
Petitioner: Chico Nakia Curry
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Stephens
as 5:2014cv01127
Petitioner: Chico Nakia Curry
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Currie et al
as 5:2014cv00968
Respondent: G. Currie and K. Ward
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Roy Allen Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Currie v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2014cv00088
Petitioner: Earl F. Currie
Respondent: William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Currie v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00067
Petitioner: Earl F. Currie
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Stephens
as 3:2014cv00098
Petitioner: Rodney Lynn Curry
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raines v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00100
Respondent: Warden G. Currie and William Stephens
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Dalawrence Raines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02369
Petitioner: Jeremiah Addon Curry
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv02201
Petitioner: Jeremiah Addon Curry
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?