Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Jacome v. Hill et al
as 3:2022cv00546
Petitioner:
Alexander Jacome
Respondent:
James S. Hill, Gavin Newsom and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kantee W. Jacobs v. Trent Allen et al
as 2:2022cv03651
Plaintiff:
Kantee W. Jacobs
Defendant:
Trent Allen, CDCR and Governor Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenyon Darrell Brown v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00438
Petitioner:
Kenyon Darrell Brown
Respondent:
State of California, Gov Gavin Newsome and CDCR Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Harris v. Newsom
as 2:2021cv02124
Petitioner:
Darren Harris
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kantee Wreh Jacobs v. CDCR et al
as 2:2021cv05673
Petitioner:
Kantee Wreh Jacobs
Respondent:
CDCR and Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alfonso Aranda v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2021cv04958
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom and Ralph Diaz
Petitioner:
Alfonso Aranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steven Deon Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv05405
Petitioner:
Steven Deon Turner, Jr.
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Warden John or Jane Doe, Governor Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zuri Sana-Kabisa Young v. Gavin Newsome et al
as 2:2020cv10718
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome and Secretary Ralph M Diaz
Plaintiff:
Zuri Sana-Kabisa Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Julie Elizabeth Harper v. CIW Warden et al
as 2:2020cv10902
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, J. Core, CIW Warden and others
Petitioner:
Julie Elizabeth Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Jones v. Newsom
as 1:2020cv01583
Petitioner:
Kevin Jones
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
