Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Kevin Curtis Cannon v. San Bernardino County
as 5:2020cv01429
Respondent:
San Bernardino County
Petitioner:
Kevin Curtis Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Jenkins v. San Bernardino County Jail
as 5:2020cv01125
Petitioner:
Raymond E. Jenkins
Respondent:
San Bernardino County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freddy Zavala Odanga v. San Bernardino County
as 5:2020cv00187
Respondent:
San Bernardino County
Petitioner:
Freddy Zavala Odanga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jesse Lobato v. San Bernardino County et al
as 2:2019cv10312
Respondent:
San Bernardino County and State of California
Petitioner:
Jessie Lobato and Jesse Lobato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arnulfo Navarro v. San Bernardino County Sheriff
as 5:2018cv02359
Respondent:
San Bernardino County Sheriff
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyler v. The Superior Court of San Bernardino County
as 1:2017cv01376
Petitioner:
Elonza Jesse Tyler
Respondent:
The Superior Court of San Bernardino County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ilich Vargas v. John McMahon
as 17-55324
Petitioner - Appellant:
ILICH VARGAS, AKA Ilich Ernesto Vargas Romero
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MCMAHON, San Bernardino County Sheriff
William Alexander Lopez v. People et al
as 5:2016cv01705
Respondent:
District Attorney San Bernardino County and People
Petitioner:
William Alexander Lopez
Tymr Abdullah v. Superior Court of the State of California et al
as 5:2016cv00461
Petitioner:
Tymr Ibn Abdullah
CPOA:
California Peace Officers Assoc.
Respondent:
Bradley Carlson No. 1157, District Attorney's Office of S.B. County, Probation Dept., John Doe No. 187126 and others
Michael John Arnold v. San Bernardino County Probation Department
as 5:2015cv01649
Petitioner:
Michael John Arnold
Respondent:
San Bernardino County Probation Department and The Attorney General of the State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
