Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Chavez v. Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2014cv01260
Petitioner:
James D. Chavez
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. CDCR and Board of Prison Term et al
as 4:2014cv01958
Plaintiff:
Diwon Deshawn White
Defendant:
CDCR and Board of Prison Term and Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeremy Brandon v. Board of Prison Terms, et al
as 14-55610
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER BRANDON
Respondent - Appellee:
BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, P. D. BRAZELTON and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Carr v. Hill et al
as 5:2014cv00049
Petitioner:
Marion A. Carr
Respondent:
Rick Hill and Board of Prison Term
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kabede v. State of California Board of Prison Terms et al
as 3:2013cv03746
Petitioner:
Wondiyrad Kabede
Respondent:
State of California Board of Prison Terms and W. Knipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puerto v. Board of Prison Term
as 1:2013cv01097
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez Puerto
Respondent:
Board of Prison Term
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricardo Gaxiola v. Board of Prison Term, et al
as 13-55292
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO MARTINEZ GAXIOLA
Respondent - Appellee:
BOARD OF PRISON TERM and J. TIM OCHOA, Warden
Owens v. California Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2013cv00156
Petitioner:
Kimmie L. Owens
Respondent:
California Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeremy Christopher Brandon v. Board of Prison Terms et al
as 2:2012cv10877
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms, P D Brazelton and People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Jeremy Christopher Brandon
Fisher v. San Francisco County Jail et al
as 3:2012cv05616
Petitioner:
Rudolph S. Fisher
Respondent:
San Francisco County Jail and Board of Prison Term
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
