General Cases filed in Montana
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Sconce v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2014cv00231
Petitioner: David Wayne Sconce
Respondent: State of Montana, State of California and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In Re Donnie Nolan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00015
Petitioner: Donnie Darrell Nolan
Intervenor: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00013
Petitioner: Pedro Hernandez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Messerly v. United States of America
as 9:2010cv00122
Petitioner: Leon Messerly
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Demos v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00015
Petitioner: John Robert Demos
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Daniel v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv00041
Petitioner: Karen Camille Daniel
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Charette v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00028
Petitioner: Alfred Francis Charette
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferguson v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00023
Petitioner: Donald Keith Ferguson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Charette v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv00069
Petitioner: Alfred Francis Charette
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00058
Petitioner: John Robert Demos
Respondent: United States of America, State of Washington and Territory of Washington
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?