Cases 11 - 20 of 69
LEWIS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2017cv00330
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JAMES LEWIS, DARILYNN KNAUSS, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv07528
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH , MR. ORTIZ , JAMES E. SHADID and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv05017
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FOE-A-MAN v. SHANAHAN et al
as 2:2015cv02731
Petitioner:
ROBERTO ANTONIO FOE-A-MAN
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN , WAYNE MULLER , JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PAULINO et al, v. HOLT, et al.,
as 3:2015cv00538
Petitioner:
JOAN PAULINO, ALBERT W. FLORENCE, JERRY T. GRANT and others
Respondent:
HOLT, TONY MACK, ROBERT E. ANDREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNS v. SHANAHAN et al
as 2:2015cv00251
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE JOHNS
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN , WAYNE MULLER , JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv06478
Petitioner:
OSMOND WAYNE DAVIS
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FERGUSON v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2012cv05981
Petitioner:
ALRICK WAYNE FERGUSON
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERSAUD v. SHANAHAN et al
as 2:2012cv05661
Petitioner:
PATRICK PERSAUD
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, WAYNE MULLER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SAMUEL v. AVILES et al
as 2:2012cv04776
Petitioner:
CASMAN KENDOL SAMUEL
Respondent:
OACAR AVILES, WAYNE MULLER, RUBEN PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
