Cases 11 - 20 of 31
BROWN-BEY v. CCP OF PHILA. CNTY et al
as 2:2015cv02405
Petitioner:
WILLIE BROWN-BEY
Respondent:
CCP OF PHILA. CNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TALBERT v. FARRELL
as 2:2015cv01093
Petitioner:
CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
MICHELE FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN-BEY v. CCP OF PHILA. CTY et al
as 2:2015cv00058
Petitioner:
WILLIE BROWN-BEY
Respondent:
CCP OF PHILA. CTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKER v. WARDEN MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv06574
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
WARDEN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MICHELE FARREL, DERICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv06573
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
MICHELE FARRELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv06572
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
MICHELE FARRELL, ANGELO FOGLIETTA, ESQ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN-BEY v. CCP OF PHILA. CTY et al
as 2:2014cv06321
Petitioner:
WILLIE BROWN-BEY
Respondent:
CCP OF PHILA. CTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PARKER
as 2:2014cv06158
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
JASON PARKER, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL, JUDGE MEANS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BISHOP v. FARRELL
as 2:2014cv03013
Petitioner:
OMAR BISHOP
Respondent:
MICHELLE FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHASE v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv02380
Petitioner:
RONALD CHASE
Respondent:
M. FARRELL and SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
