Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Miller v. Keys
as 1:2023cv00961
Petitioner:
Shariff Miller
Respondent:
R D Keys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ross, Kaleb v. Kaul, Josh et al
as 3:2023cv00357
Petitioner:
Kaleb D. Ross
Respondent:
Attorney General Josh Kaul, Probation Agent Kristy Zander, Lance Wiersma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv00594
Petitioner:
Michael D Martin
Respondent:
Wardem Randall Hepp and Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Addison v. Meisner
as 1:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Maries D Addison
Respondent:
Michel Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Severson
as 2:2023cv00505
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Waukesha County Jail, Eric Severson, Pamela Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hopson v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv00457
Petitioner:
Antwan D Hopson
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stafford, Bennie et al v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
Bennie Stafford and Debra Mitchell
Respondent:
Tony Evers, Wis.Attorney Gen. Josh Kaul, Wis. Chief U.S. Atty. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rausch v. Eplett
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Jerad D Rausch
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rausch v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv00309
Petitioner:
Jerad D Rausch
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Milwaukee County Jail
as 2:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
Michael D Smith
Respondent:
Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
