Cases 11 - 20 of 4,292
Harrelson v. USA
as 0:2024cv00078
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Harrelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Toomey
as 1:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Versace Alan Scott
Respondent:
Joshua Toomey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pride v. Paul, et al
as 5:2024cv00204
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden and Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Andrae Pride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Arnold
as 1:2024cv00096
Respondent:
Jailer (TN) Klint Arnold
Petitioner:
Matthew M. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perryman v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Michael Perryman
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McQuiston v. Lovett
as 6:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Dale Conrad McQuiston
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ricks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00045
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Keith Ricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00100
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knutson v. Levitt/Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00095
Respondent:
A-3 Unit Manager Lewis, J. Gilley, SiS Lt. Smith and others
Petitioner:
Todd Seaver Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 6:2024cv00096
Respondent:
Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, USP McCreary and U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
