Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Newton v. Wilson
as 6:2013cv00994
Petitioner:
Darrell E. Newton
Respondent:
Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Coursey
as 2:2012cv01957
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
Petitioner:
Sirdarius E. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mota v. Nooth
as 6:2011cv00645
Petitioner:
Ramon E. Mota
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Thomas
as 6:2011cv00239
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden J. E. Thomas
Petitioner:
Larry James Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams Jr v. Thomas et al
as 3:2011cv06015
Petitioner:
Ronald Morris Adams Jr
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Robert E. McFadden, Randy McWilliams, Kevin Straight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. Thomas
as 3:2011cv00011
Petitioner:
Joshua Allen James
Respondent:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Yamhill County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2010cv01345
Petitioner:
Jermaine E. Anderson, Sr.
Respondent:
Ronald Stone and Yamhill County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Thomas et al
as 3:2010cv01320
Respondent:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and J. E. Thomas
Petitioner:
Charles M. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barber v. Multnomah County Sheriff et al
as 3:2010cv01121
Petitioner:
James E. Barber, Jr.
Respondent:
Multnomah County Sheriff and Whitman County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burdeau v. Thomas
as 2:2010cv00888
Plaintiff:
Herbert Burdeau
Defendant:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
