Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Shoemaker v. Gipson
as 4:2011cv02674
Petitioner:
Jedidiah Shoemaker
Respondent:
People of the State of California, Contra Costa County Superior Court and Connie Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William McCann v. Lionel Chatham
as 10-17023
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. MCCANN
Respondent - Appellee:
LIONEL CHATHAM, Chief Probation Officer, Contra Costa County
Oscar Pearson v. Rupf, et al
as 10-16128
Petitioner - Appellant:
OSCAR MAURICE PEARSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RUPF, Contra Costa County Sheriff, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Davis v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County
as 3:2009cv02561
Petitioner:
Michael Jack Davis
Respondent:
Superior Court of Contra Costa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Contra Costa County Sheriff Rupf et al
as 5:2009cv02477
Petitioner:
Oscar Maurice Pearson
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff Rupf, Contra Costa County Superior Court and California Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baxter v. Attorney General For The State Of California et al
as 5:2008cv05289
Petitioner:
James Paul Baxter
Respondent:
Attorney General For The State Of California, Jerry Brown and Contra Costa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fentanes v. Superior Court of the State of California Contra Costa County
as 3:2008cv04681
Petitioner:
Francisco J. Fentanes
Respondent:
Superior Court of the State of California Contra Costa County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kahute v. Contra Costa County Superior Court
as 5:2007cv00142
Petitioner:
Richard J. Kahute
Respondent:
Contra Costa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.