Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Kind v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2016cv01649
Petitioner:
Harold C Kind, Jr
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horne v. Humphrey et al
as 2:2016cv01036
Petitioner:
Jimmie E Horne
Respondent:
Robert Humphrey , Brad D Schimel and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Svea, Timothy v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00228
Petitioner:
Timothy E. Svea
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Jon E. Litscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01530
Petitioner:
Gabriel Griffin
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Seehafer, Michael v. Wis Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv00689
Petitioner:
Michael R. Seehafer
Respondent:
Wis Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01037
Petitioner:
James E Miller
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Mr Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simpson v. Walker et al
as 2:2015cv01017
Petitioner:
Willie C Simpson
Respondent:
Scott Walker, Department of Corrections and William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peterson v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 2:2015cv00888
Petitioner:
Roger Joel Peterson
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burkett v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2014cv01160
Petitioner:
Andre Burkett
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simpson, Willie v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Petitioner:
Willie Simpson
Respondent:
Gary Boughton , Edward F. Walls and Wisconsin Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
