Cases 21 - 30 of 345
Brandon Christopher Ritter v. Kelly Santoro
as 5:2022cv02176
Petitioner:
Brandon Christopher Ritter
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sundberg v. State of California et al
as 3:2022cv01897
Petitioner:
Kelly Frithiof Sundberg
Respondent:
State of California, Patton State Hospital, Janine Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McFadden v. Santoro
as 4:2022cv07504
Petitioner:
Akeim Rashad McFadden
Respondent:
Warden Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlos Marez v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2022cv08581
Petitioner:
Carlos Marez
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv04038
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
T. Allen and D. Brisht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00951
Petitioner:
Kelly Beau Davis
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliot Kimo Laanui v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2022cv04365
Petitioner:
Elliot Kimo Laanui
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akil Robbins v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2022cv04234
Petitioner:
Akil Robbins
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Atenley et al
as 3:2022cv03032
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Warden Atenley, Doctor Michael Yeh, Doctor Lara Danils and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Clarke v. SCSO et al
as 2:2022cv00380
Petitioner:
Lee Kelly Clarke
Respondent:
SCSO, M. Johnson, Randell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
