Cases 21 - 30 of 305
(HC) Martinez v. Allison
as 1:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Carlos Martinez
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norberto Serna v. David Holbrook, et al
as 23-15095
Petitioner / Appellant:
NORBERTO SERNA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID HOLBROOK, Warden and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary
(HC) Weece v. Allison
as 1:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
John Weece
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Spells v. Kathleen Allison
as 23-55000
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES SPELLS
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Michael V. Gonez v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Michael V. Gonez
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv02073
Petitioner:
Wendy H. Downs
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mario Ponce v. Brian Cates, et al
as 22-56168
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO VIDAL PONCE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN CATES, Warden and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary CDCR
(HC) Hernandez v. Allison
as 2:2022cv02274
Petitioner:
Eric Hernandez
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Uhuru v. Allison et al
as 2:2022cv02024
Petitioner:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, J. Benavidez and Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McCurry v. Allison
as 1:2022cv01398
Petitioner:
Scott Allen McCurry
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
