Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Mungia v. Hinds County Detention Center Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2016cv00188
Petitioner:
Telse Shalin Mungia
Respondent:
Hinds County Detention Center Board of Supervisors, Tyrone Lewis and Hinds County Court System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ransburgh v. Lee et al
as 4:2015cv00111
Petitioner:
Lewis Ransburgh
Respondent:
Earnest Lee and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ransburgh v. Mississippi Parole Board et al
as 4:2015cv00079
Petitioner:
Lewis Ransburgh, Sr.
Respondent:
Mississippi Parole Board and Special Assit. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Easterling v. McKenzie
as 3:2014cv00797
Plaintiff:
Dana M. Easterling
Defendant:
Kenneth Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Lee et al
as 1:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Johnny Lewis Washington
Respondent:
Ernest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
as 1:2014cv00235
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. King
as 3:2013cv00923
Defendant:
Ronald King
Plaintiff:
Lewis Henry Thompson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. King
as 4:2013cv00050
Defendant:
Ronald King
Plaintiff:
Lewis Henry Thompson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaskin v. Jackson
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Gaskin
Defendant:
Kathy King Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moody v. Anderson et al
as 4:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
Rodney Moody
Defendant:
Linda R. Anderson, Erin O'Leary Chalk, M. Garland Lyell, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
