Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Banks v. Lewis et al
as 1:2019cv01388
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, Administrative Office for U.S. Courts, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2019cv02969
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
ANDRE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Bradley
as 1:2019cv01167
Respondent:
Warden Bradley
Petitioner:
Dietrick Lewis Johnson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv03098
Petitioner:
JIBREEL I. LEWIS
Respondent:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL OVERMYER and PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2018cv02449
Petitioner:
JAMAL LEWIS
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv01097
Petitioner:
Jeremy E. Lewis
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv00758
Petitioner:
Jeremy E. Lewis
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KNIGHT v. TICE et al
as 5:2018cv00661
Petitioner:
LEWIS BENJAMIN KNIGHT
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS-BAY v. MURTHA et al
as 2:2017cv04064
Petitioner:
TYRONE LEWIS-BAY
Respondent:
MURTHA, DEPT. OF PRISONS, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2017cv03080
Petitioner:
DARNELL RAY LEWIS, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, OVERMYER and SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
