Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Neuman v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00828
Respondent:
John Doe and Collete Peters
Petitioner:
Robert Adam Neuman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stacy v. Laney et al
as 3:2013cv02206
Respondent:
Garrett Laney, Collette Peters and Ellen Rosenblum
Petitioner:
Thaddeus Andrew Stacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jurich v. Taylor et al
as 2:2013cv01002
Petitioner:
David Michael Jurich
Respondent:
Collette Peters and Jeri Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. State of Oregon
as 6:2011cv01298
Petitioner:
Joshua Douglas Peters
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Nooth
as 3:2009cv00539
Petitioner:
Robert Deshaun Peters
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norkeveck v. Mills
as 3:2008cv01170
Petitioner:
Peter J. Norkeveck
Respondent:
Don Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Oregon State Hospital et al
as 3:2008cv00577
Petitioner:
Matthew D. Peters
Respondent:
Oregon State Hospital and Roy Orr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Giusto
as 3:2007cv01863
Petitioner:
Matthew D. Peters
Respondent:
Bernie Giusto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akcabay v. Keisler et al
as 3:2007cv01679
Petitioner:
Muhlis Akcabay
Respondent:
Peter D. Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Neil Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 6:2007cv06315
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Robert A. Fiatal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
