Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Newby v. Schofield
as 3:2014cv01942
Petitioner:
Bert Newby
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Schofield
as 3:2014cv01937
Petitioner:
Marvin Green
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Preston Schofield v. James Dekleva, et al
as 14-14234
Petitioner - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, DONALD ESLINGER, Sheriff and JAMES DEKLEVA, Judge
Williams v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv02652
Petitioner:
Jerome Williams
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Preston Schofield v. James Dekleva, et al
as 14-13598
Petitioner - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES DEKLEVA, Judge, STATE OF FLORIDA and DONALD ESLINGER, Sheriff
Williams v. Schofield et al
as 3:2014cv01612
Petitioner:
Jerome Williams
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Dekleva
as 6:2014cv01187
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva, State of Florida and Sheriff, Seminole County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Dekleva et al
as 6:2014cv01188
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva, State Of Florida and Donald Eslinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton v. Schofield, et al
as 3:2014cv01469
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Clifton
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield , Charles Traughber, Richard Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Eidson v. Weatherford et al
as 3:2014cv01408
Petitioner:
Gregory Stephen Eidson
Respondent:
Sonny Weatherford, Tennessee Department of Corrections and Derrick Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
