Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Agedah v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2012cv00175
Petitioner:
Theophilus Agedah
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Thomas Decker and Thomas Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muratovic v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2012cv00124
Petitioner:
Arthur A. Muratovic
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano , Thomas Decker and Thomas Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Agedah v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2011cv02153
Petitioner:
Theophilus Agedah
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Thomas Decker and Thomas Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AYODELE v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2011cv02063
Petitioner:
Olusegun Bexley Ayodele
Respondent:
Eric Holder , Janet Napolitano , Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oskay v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2011cv01523
Petitioner:
Ender Oskay
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States , Thomas Duran , Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nunes v. Decker et al
as 3:2011cv01430
Petitioner:
Devon Nunes
Respondent:
Thomas Decker , Mary Sobal and Eric Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gell v. Sabol et al
as 3:2011cv01423
Petitioner:
Francisco Antonio Gell
Respondent:
Mary Sabol , York County Prison , Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz-Cabrera v. Sabol et al
as 1:2011cv01065
Petitioner:
Alexander Jose Diaz-Cabrera
Respondent:
Mary E. Sabol , The Department of Homeland Security , Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. Sabol et al
as 1:2011cv01064
Petitioner:
Sandy R. Hernandez
Respondent:
Mary E. Sabol , The Department of Homeland Security , Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peguero v. Sabol et al
as 1:2011cv00585
Petitioner:
Julio Peguero
Respondent:
Mary E. Sabol , Thomas Decker , Michael T. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
