Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 1:2020cv02231
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Milinavicius v. Ward et al
as 1:2020cv01815
Petitioner:
Rolandas Milinavicius
Respondent:
Honorable Christopher Carr and Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mays v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv01820
Petitioner:
Willie Mays
Respondent:
Timothy Ward and Hilton Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2020cv01696
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, Jacquline Bunn, Esq,, United States District Court, Georgia and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Herrington v. Laughlin
as 1:2020cv00052
Petitioner:
Anthony Herrington and Anthony Lamar Kitchens
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Warden Vance Laughlin and Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENDERSON v. LAUGHLIN
as 1:2019cv04112
Petitioner:
LEWIS EDWARD HENDERSON
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Vance Laughlin and Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. State of Georgia
as 1:2019cv03927
Respondent:
Core Civic, State of Georgia, Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Adams et al
as 1:2019cv01227
Respondent:
Timothy Ward and Robert Adams, Jr.
Petitioner:
Sylvester Leon Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENNING v. DEAL et al
as 1:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
RALPH HARRISON BENNING
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, HOMER BRYSON, CARLTON POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
