Cases 21 - 30 of 465
Robinson v. Attorney General for the State of Alaska et al
as 3:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Jayson Sterling Robinson
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alaska, Superior Court for the State of Alaska at Anchorage and Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Sherrie I. Wilson
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bachmeier v. Einerson
as 3:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Steven-Curtis Bachmeier
Respondent:
Lynnie Einerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moen v. Satterberg et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Daniel-William Moen
Respondent:
Daniel T. Satterberg, Julia Garratt, Ketu Shah and others
Slaikeu v. Milburn
as 3:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Jonathan Alexander Slaikeu
Respondent:
James Milburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Sherrie Ina Wilson
Defendant:
Brandon Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobson v. Hernandez
as 3:2023cv00133
Petitioner:
Hakiem Jordan Dobson
Respondent:
A. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
Lovie Devon Houston
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00117
Petitioner:
Sherrie Wilson
Respondent:
Brandon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Cordle
as 3:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Thompson
Respondent:
Robert Cordle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
