Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Yagao v. California, State of et al
as 3:2015cv02554
Petitioner:
Macjhay Yagao
Respondent:
California, State of and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagood v. California, State of
as 3:2015cv02039
Petitioner:
Harold C. Hagood, Jr.
Respondent:
California, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DuRoss v. California State Prison Warden
as 2:2015cv01871
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony DuRoss
Respondent:
California State Prison Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. California, State of et al
as 3:2015cv01921
Petitioner:
Bruce Thomas
Respondent:
California, State of , California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Ruben Lopez v. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv06357
Respondent:
California State Prison and Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles
Petitioner:
Daniel Ruben Lopez
Allen v. California State Prison - SAC
as 2:2015cv01637
Petitioner:
Michael DeWayne Allen
Respondent:
California State Prison - SAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. California State Prison - SAC
as 3:2015cv01554
Petitioner:
Michael Allen
Respondent:
California State Prison - SAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Favor v. Warden, California State Prison et al
as 3:2015cv01482
Petitioner:
Brandon Alexander Favor
Respondent:
Warden, California State Prison , Kamala D. Harris and Edmund G. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. California State Prison Sacramento
as 2:2015cv01297
Petitioner:
Christopher Antoine Turner
Respondent:
California State Prison Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. California, State of et al
as 3:2015cv00772
Petitioner:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Respondent:
California, State of and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
