Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Kesselring v. McKune et al
as 5:2010cv03003
Petitioner:
Michael Kesselring
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payton v. McKune
as 5:2009cv03205
Petitioner:
Walter Almon Payton
Respondent:
David R. McKune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03171
Petitioner:
Brad Lee Jones
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03165
Petitioner:
Vernon D. Harris
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Steven Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03151
Petitioner:
Melvin Holmes
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pink v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03121
Petitioner:
Malcolm T. Pink
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Steven Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waitzmann v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03089
Petitioner:
Michael Waitzmann
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tolen v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03031
Petitioner:
Garnet C. Tolen
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Swanner v. McKune, et al
as 08-3352
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLAYTON SWANNER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL NELSON, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and STEPHEN N. SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Lopez v. McKune, et al
as 08-3284
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and PAUL MORRISON, Kansas Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
