Cases 31 - 40 of 117
Reynolds v. Rodriguez et al
as 6:2018cv06506
Petitioner:
Marlon Reynolds
Respondent:
A. Rodriguez, A. Annucci and H. O. Spink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Miller
as 1:2018cv02015
Respondent:
Superintendant Christopher Miller
Petitioner:
Ronny Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2018cv00127
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Sims
Respondent:
Gregory Rodriguez and Jerome Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Borders El Bey v. Doe #31 et al
as 6:2017cv06565
Plaintiff:
Michael Borders El Bey
Defendant:
John Doe #31, John Doe #32, Marianne Yaru and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 1:2017cv05044
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Rodriguez
Respondent:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Menendez-Rodriguez v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv04809
Respondent:
Thomas Decker , Scott Mechkowski , Thomas D. Homan and others
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Menendez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flint v. Antoinette et al
as 1:2017cv04446
Plaintiff:
John Flint
Defendant:
Moravec Antoinette, Luces, Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Graham
as 1:2017cv03395
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner:
Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez et al v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 2:2016cv05615
Petitioner:
Edwin Leonel Rodriguez and Edwin Ricardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Suffolk County and The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Griffin
as 9:2016cv01037
Petitioner:
Jose A. Rodriguez
Respondent:
Thomas Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
