Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Pablo Gomez v. California Board of Parole Hea
as 10-17698
Petitioner - Appellant:
PABLO GOMEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Galinski v. California Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 3:2010cv05184
Petitioner:
Victor Galinski
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings and Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matlock v. Martel, et al
as 2:2010cv03049
Petitioner:
Michael Stephen Matlock
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings, James Fox and Myra A. Weiher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miguel Moreira-Alfaro v. California Board of Parole Hea, et al
as 10-17531
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL MOREIRA-ALFARO
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS and ROBERT W. WONG, Acting Warden
Matlock v. California Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 3:2010cv04410
Petitioner:
Michael Matlock
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings, James Fox and Myra A. Weiher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frank Benson v. Matthew Kramer, et al
as 10-17135
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK KENNETH BENSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW C. KRAMER, Warden and CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Backes v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 3:2010cv02565
Petitioner:
Perry A. Backes
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carrasco v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 4:2010cv01935
Petitioner:
Miguel Carrasco
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carrasco v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 1:2010cv00744
Petitioner:
Miguel Carrasco
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald Green v. Larry Small, et al
as 10-55493
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY SMALL, Warden and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
