General Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Taryn Christian v. Clayton Frank, et al
as 17-15460
Petitioner - Appellant: TARYN CHRISTIAN
Respondent - Appellee: CLAYTON FRANK, Director, State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety and STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Christopher Slavick v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 16-17071
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER SLAVICK
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF HAWAII and FRANCIS SEQUEIRA, HCF- Warden
Smith v. State of Hawaii et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00261
Petitioner: Derrick Smith
Respondent: State of Hawaii and Saguaro Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webster v. Espinda et al
as 1:2016cv00253
Petitioner: Tarval Webster
Respondent: Nolan P. Espinda and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowther v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2016cv00148
Petitioner: Evan Kimokeo Lowther
Respondent: State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz v. State of Hawaii We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00126
Petitioner: Anibal Ortiz
Respondent: State of Hawaii and Raymond Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kehano v. Sequeira et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Petitioner: Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Respondent: Francis X. Sequeira, Richard T. Bissen, Davelynn M. Tengan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Slavick v. State of Hawaii We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00424
Petitioner: Christopher Slavick
Respondent: State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Francis Grandinetti v. State of Texas and agents et al
as 2:2015cv06174
Respondent: All initiating parties or agents or contractors, David A. Burrows, Governor George W. Bush and others
Petitioner: Francis Grandinetti
Smith v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2015cv00057
Petitioner: Tyrone Smith
Respondent: State of Hawaii and Nolan Espinda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?