Cases 31 - 40 of 4,212
Duarte v. Romero et al
as 5:2022cv00479
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Officer Wilson Romero, Major of Corr. Christy N. Welman, Verneta Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00303
Petitioner:
George Ray Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01368
Petitioner:
Markell Deon Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00809
Petitioner:
Genevia Davis
Respondent:
Bobby D Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. United States Of America
as 3:2022cv00740
Petitioner:
Toddrick Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv00569
Petitioner:
Benjamin Davis and Benjamin Everist Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. United States Of America
as 7:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Toddrick Davis
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez v. Rayford et al
as 5:2022cv00279
Petitioner:
Charlie Perez
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford, Roger L. Boyd, Vernet A. Davis, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00060
Petitioner:
George Ray Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03849
Petitioner:
Thurston Rickey-Lee Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
