Cases 41 - 50 of 1,017
Albert Lee Mitchell v. B. Berkholz
as 2:2023cv02467
Petitioner:
Albert Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
B. Berkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curtis Tyrell Bunn v. B. Lammer
as 5:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Curtis Tyrell Bunn
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ronald L. Lopez v. B. Philips
as 2:2023cv02260
Petitioner:
Ronald L. Lopez
Respondent:
B. Philips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James M. Murray v. Warden B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv02139
Petitioner:
James M. Murray
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jose Lizarraras-Chacon v. Warden B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv01865
Petitioner:
Jose Lizarraras-Chacon
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Springs v. Trate
as 2:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Eric Lebron Springs
Respondent:
B. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arturo Favela-Gomez v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv01773
Petitioner:
Arturo Favela-Gomez
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jose Antonio Gomez-Cuzme v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv01753
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Gomez-Cuzme
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Andranik Amiryan v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv01663
Petitioner:
Andranik Amiryan
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adewale Aniyeloye v. Warden B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv01610
Petitioner:
Adewale Aniyeloye
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
