Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Hopkins v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv01434
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Tyon Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv00867
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Ernest Dean Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv00556
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Breck W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Neven
as 2:2011cv00518
Respondent:
D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Alberto Caro Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deleon v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv01348
Petitioner:
Steven Deleon
Respondent:
Nevada Department Of Corrections, D.W. Neven and State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wentzell v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv01024
Respondent:
Attorney General and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Christopher Noel Wentzell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walkup v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00475
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LeBoeuf v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00448
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Caldwell v. Neven et al
as 2:2009cv01155
Petitioner:
William Eldridge Caldwell
Respondent:
D.W. Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James Nellums v. D.W. Neven
as 09-15205
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES NELLUMS
Respondent - Appellee:
D.W. NEVENS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
