Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Clark v. Kelly et al
as 2:2007cv00227
Petitioner:
Patrick Evans Clark
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fowler v. Kelly et al
as 1:2007cv00308
Petitioner:
Robert K. Fowler
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Kelly
as 5:2007cv00176
Plaintiff:
Andrew Brown
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peacock v. Kelly et al
as 3:2007cv00109
Petitioner:
James Peacock
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westbrook v. Kelly et al
as 1:2007cv00214
Petitioner:
Larry Westbrook
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Kelly et al
as 5:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dewayne Carter
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Simmons et al
as 5:2007cv00167
Plaintiff:
Sidney Nelson
Defendant:
Tim Simmons and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend v. Kelly et al
as 1:2007cv00210
Petitioner:
Barry Stephan Townsend
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sipp v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00970
Plaintiff:
Herman Sipp
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Longino v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00705
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Longino
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
