Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Carter v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv00030
Petitioner:
Jon Paul Carter
Respondent:
Georgia Department of Corrections, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and Supreme Court of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Williams et al
as 4:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Gerald H. Miller
Defendant:
Stanley Williams and State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Williams et al
as 6:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gerald H. Miller
Defendant:
Stanley Williams and State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vadde v. State Of Georgia
as 1:2011cv00122
Petitioner:
Srinivas V. Vadde
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cowan v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2010cv04168
Petitioner:
Stephen Craig Cowan
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Hart et al
as 5:2009cv00063
Petitioner:
William Hope Davis
Respondent:
J. Darrell Hart, State Board of Pardons and Paroles, L. Gale Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. State Board of Pardon and Paroles
as 4:2008cv00135
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Brown
Respondent:
State Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. State Board of Pardon and Paroles
as 4:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Williams
Defendant:
State Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. State Of Georgia et al
as 6:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lamar White
Defendant:
State Of Georgia and State Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herrington v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 2:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
Parnell B. Herrington
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
