Cases 41 - 50 of 253
Hines v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00854
Petitioner:
Quantae T Hines
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley Young v. State of Wisconsin
as 22-2231
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADLEY JAMES YOUNG
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Durley v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00793
Petitioner:
Timothy Durley
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jensen v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00744
Petitioner:
Paul Anthony Jensen
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00718
Petitioner:
Aquianna LMonique Brown
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams, Sharon v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2022cv00317
Petitioner:
Sharon D. Williams
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Petitioner:
Derrick Watkins
Respondent:
State of Florida, T R Chase, T Helm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicolai v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00561
Petitioner:
Jamie Lynn Nicolai
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dicosimo v. Slate et al
as 2:2022cv00420
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Joseph Dicosimo
Respondent:
Mark T Slate, Gerise N Laspesa, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Black v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv00261
Petitioner:
George Black
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
