Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Tavare Stefin v. James Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv08324
Petitioner:
Tavare Stefin
Respondent:
James E Tilton and Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Tilton v. Tilton et al
as 1:2007cv01795
Petitioner:
Michael E. Tilton
Respondent:
James E. Tilton and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowe v. Tilton
as 3:2007cv02232
Petitioner:
Clarke Sheldon Lowe
Respondent:
James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur Estrada v. James E Tilton
as 5:2007cv01510
Petitioner:
Arthur Estrada
Respondent:
James E Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leon v. Yates et al
as 3:2007cv05719
Petitioner:
David Michael Leon
Respondent:
James A. Yates and James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luis Manuel Cardenas v. James E Tilton
as 2:2007cv07216
Petitioner:
Luis Manuel Cardenas
Respondent:
Jame E Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kleinhammer v. Tilton
as 2:2007cv07217
Petitioner:
Richard Kleinhammer
Respondent:
James E Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John A Barco v. James E Tilton
as 2:2007cv07163
Petitioner:
John A Barco
Respondent:
Jame E Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen Oneal Pritchard v. James E Tilton
as 2:2007cv06928
Petitioner:
Stephen Oneal Pritchard
Respondent:
James E Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villegas v. Tilton et al
as 3:2007cv02035
Petitioner:
Mark Steven Villegas
Respondent:
James E Tilton and Edmond G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
