Cases 51 - 60 of 4,833
Morrison v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00274
Petitioner:
Phillip Morrison
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Heavener v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
John E Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
David L Daniels
Respondent:
FNU Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan et al v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Kirk Brogie, Ernest Draper and others
Respondent:
Joseph Biden and David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. Reheard
as 6:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Brian Tyrone Scott
Respondent:
Deborah A. Reheard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Harvanek
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Lonnie Love
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
Dexter Leemon Johnson
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Wisner et al
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Matthew Joseph Douglas
Respondent:
Geri Wisner, Matthew J. Hall and Lisa Otipoby-Herbert
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Travis v. Seminole Nation Tribal Court
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Ralph Eugene Travis
Respondent:
Seminole Nation Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Buss et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Channen Ray Ozell Smith
Defendant:
David Buss, Getner Drummond and Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
