Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Hill v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv00565
Petitioner:
Howard L. Hill, II
Respondent:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv00469
Petitioner:
Howard L. Hill, II
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv00213
Petitioner:
Howard L. Hill, II
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv02268
Petitioner:
Howard L. Hill, II
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2012cv02102
Petitioner:
David E. Hill
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. FISHER et al
as 2:2012cv05194
Petitioner:
LAVOND HILL
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER, WILLIAM SETH and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL v. FISHER et al
as 2:2012cv04918
Petitioner:
LAVOND HILL
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv02185
Petitioner:
DONETTA HILL
Respondent:
WETZEL, GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2012cv00662
Petitioner:
DWAYNE HILL
Respondent:
STEVEN GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
