General Cases filed in Montana
Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Toth v. Mahoney et al
as 2:2008cv00020
Petitioner: Jonathan J Toth
Respondent: Mike Mahoney and Mike McGrath
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lantis v. Mahoney
as 4:2008cv00008
Petitioner: Jerry Lantis
Respondent: Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edmundson v. Mahoney, et al
as 6:2007cv00053
Petitioner: Rodney A. Edmundson
Respondent: Mike Mahoney and Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beebe v. Mahoney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2007cv00076
Petitioner: Eric Wayne Beebe
Respondent: Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nauman v. Mahoney
as 9:2007cv00144
Petitioner: Brian Nauman
Respondent: Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Mahoney
as 6:2007cv00075
Petitioner: Burly Grimes
Respondent: Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmundson v. Mahoney et al
as 9:2007cv00125
Petitioner: Rodney A. Edmundson
Respondent: Mike Mahoney and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Mahoney et al
as 4:2007cv00093
Petitioner: Joseph R. Marshall
Respondent: Mike Mahoney and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley v. State of Montana
as 4:2007cv00087
Petitioner: Thomas Michael Kelley
Respondent: Mike Mahoney and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnacascel v. Mahoney
as 6:2007cv00044
Petitioner: Zande Barnacascel
Respondent: Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?