Cases 61 - 70 of 465
Lacap v. Bureau of Prisons, Sentence Designation and Computation Center
as 3:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Cloyd Lacap
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Sentence Designation and Computation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Larson v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Jeremy L. Larson
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Smith
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Smith
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cathey v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
King David Jai Wynte Cathey
Respondent:
Krista Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Daryl Clyde Edwards
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akelkok v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Constantine Quisto Akelkok
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plummer v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Plummer
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Forte v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Forte
Defendant:
Supt III Hernandez, PO III Schwanki, Supt I Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Slaikeu v. Moses et al
as 3:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Alexander Slaikeu
Defendant:
Richard Moses, Trey Taylor, Attorney General for the State of Alaska and others
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
