Cases 61 - 70 of 2,104
FAISON v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 1:2022cv02690
Plaintiff:
BURUDI FAISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
ABNER v. STATE OF TEXAS
as 1:2022cv01786
Petitioner:
EUGENE SHANNON ABNER
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VILLABOLOS v. BRITT et al
as 1:2022cv01866
Petitioner:
ABRAHAM PEDROS VILLABOLOS
Respondent:
MICHAL BRITT, CODY SCHUR, M. COOGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SHAKUR v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01669
Plaintiff:
COCHISE AMARI SHAKUR
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELDON v. ZOOK
as 1:2022cv01868
Petitioner:
GARY THOMAS SHELDON
Respondent:
K. ZOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. WHITMER et al
as 1:2022cv01653
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED and ROBERT ANDREW BEY
Respondent:
CHRIS WHITMER, UNITED STATES PAROLE BOARD AGENCY, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LUZUNARIS v. MORROGH
as 1:2022cv01698
Petitioner:
JOSE LUZUNARIS
Respondent:
RAYMOND F. MORROGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Petitioner:
THOMAS R. JONES
Defendant:
PAROLE COMMISSION
Respondent:
JONES MICHELE and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MASSEY v. LUMPKIN
as 1:2022cv01833
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LOUIS MASSEY, JR. and TIGER MASSEY
Defendant:
BOBBY LUMPKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ENLOP v. HAKE et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES ENLOP
Defendant:
JEFF HAKE, CHRIS CLASS, SIMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
