Cases 71 - 80 of 243
Roderick Lipsey v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-56346
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODERICK LIPSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary and F. B. HAWS, Warden
Gerald Harper v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-16826
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD ALLEN HARPER
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Mario Melchionne v. James Tilton
as 09-16777
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO A. MELCHIONNE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Jose Romero v. CDCR, et al
as 09-16776
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE DAVID ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, JAMES E. TILTON and DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Patrick Baylis v. James Tilton
as 09-16715
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK BAYLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Leonan Morgan v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 09-56158
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONAN LEE MORGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, The Attorney General of the State of California and JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary
Geoffrey Brown v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-56142
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEOFFREY BROWN, AKA John Jacob Reyes
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv05296
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Mario Melchionne v. James Tilton
as 09-16432
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO A. MELCHIONNE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Robert Heatley v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-16365
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT SYLVESTER HEATLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, T. OCHOA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
