Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Griffin v. Thompson
as 1:2007cv01785
Petitioner:
Stanley Griffin
Respondent:
Dannie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
St. John-Thompson v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00116
Petitioner:
Christopher St. John-Thompson
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Immigration & Customs Enforcement Ditrict Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Thompson
as 1:2007cv01562
Petitioner:
Demond S. Johnson
Respondent:
Danny Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Thompson
as 5:2007cv00253
Petitioner:
Demond S. Johnson
Respondent:
Dannie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Thompson
as 1:2007cv01370
Petitioner:
Melvin Jerome Richards
Respondent:
Dannie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stocks v. Thompson
as 4:2007cv00088
Petitioner:
Howard W. Stocks
Respondent:
Dannie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Thompson et al
as 3:2007cv00013
Petitioner:
Charles D. Collins
Respondent:
Paul Thompson, Paul Thompson, Thurbert E. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Chatman et al
as 1:2007cv00695
Petitioner:
Bruce Gregory Thompson
Respondent:
Bruce Chatman and Thurbert Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Thompson
as 1:2007cv00648
Petitioner:
Michael A. Dixon
Respondent:
Paul Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Thompson
as 3:2007cv00025
Petitioner:
Fredrick D. Williams
Respondent:
Dannie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
