General Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 166
Michael Bowen v. Ernest Roe, et al
as 12-57060
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL ALLEN BOWEN
Respondent - Appellee: ERNEST ROE, Warden and CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Arthur Parchue v. Ernest Roe, et al
as 12-57043
Petitioner - Appellant: ARTHUR ANDREW PARCHUE
Respondent - Appellee: ERNEST ROE, Warden and CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Weir v. California, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02516
Petitioner: Zachary L. Weir
Respondent: California, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tryals v. California, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02333
Petitioner: Michael Dwayne Tryals
Respondent: California, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. California, State of
as 3:2012cv02181
Petitioner: Thellas Sanders
Respondent: California, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Bowen v. Ernest Roe, et al
as 12-56274
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL ALLEN BOWEN
Respondent - Appellee: ERNEST ROE and CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gholar v. Hickman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01585
Petitioner: Jules Anthony Gholar
Respondent: Robert Hickman, L. S. McEwen and California State Prison, Los Angeles County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tony Tran v. Tim Virga
as 12-56022
Petitioner - Appellant: TONY TRAN
Respondent - Appellee: TIM VIRGA, Warden, California State Prison at Sacramento
Kenneth Keel v. Diane Butler, et al
as 12-55859
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH G. KEEL
Respondent - Appellee: DIANE K. BUTLER, Warden, Substituted for Rosanne Campbell and CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez v. California, State of et al
as 3:2012cv00812
Petitioner: Ricky Rodriguez
Respondent: California, State of and Amador County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?