Cases 81 - 90 of 128
Powell v. NY Courts et al
as 1:2012cv08413
Petitioner:
Daniel W. Powell
Respondent:
NY Courts, NY Correction, NY Unemployment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Monroe County Supreme Court
as 6:2012cv06224
Petitioner:
Christopher S. Young
Respondent:
Monroe County Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bush v. Supreme Court of the County of Westchester
as 1:2012cv02908
Petitioner:
Anthony Bush
Respondent:
Supreme Court of the County of Westchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Kings County Criminal Court
as 1:2012cv01054
Petitioner:
Keith Brown
Respondent:
Kings County Criminal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Kings County Criminal Court
as 1:2012cv01053
Petitioner:
Derrick Jones
Respondent:
Kings County Criminal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gumpton v. Niagara County Court
as 1:2012cv00076
Petitioner:
Priscilla Gumpton
Respondent:
Niagara County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Westchester Supreme County Court Sentence et al
as 1:2012cv00819
Petitioner:
Donald Mack Bennett
Defendant:
Westchester Supreme County Court Sentence, Judith E. Permutt, David Ritas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruff v. Glenn Falls City Court
as 9:2011cv01455
Petitioner:
Ronald Ruff
Respondent:
Glenn Falls City Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marte et al v. Berkman et al
as 1:2011cv06082
Petitioner:
Eddy Marte and Luis Marte
Respondent:
Carol Berkman , Cyrus R. Vance and Supreme Court, State of New York, County of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Queens
as 1:2011cv03235
AMKC:
Patrick Harris
Defendant:
Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Queens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
